AI in Medical Technology: The Interplay of AI Act, MDR and IVDR
When does AI software qualify as a medical device? What requirements does the AI Act place on high-risk systems? And what do the current deadlines mean concretely for manufacturers? This whitepaper structures the regulatory complexity and translates it into options for action.
Diana Hohage
Principal Consultant
In brief
A structured guide to the interplay of MDR, IVDR and the AI Act for manufacturers of AI medical devices: classification, high-risk categorization, requirements under Art. 8-15 and a practical manufacturer roadmap through 2028.
Two possible product regimes plus an additional AI legal framework: depending on its intended purpose, AI software in medical technology falls under either the MDR or the IVDR. Where it also qualifies as an AI system within the meaning of the AI Act, the relevant AI Act requirements have to be taken into account as well. Manufacturers have to interlock these regulatory layers consistently, from classification through post-market surveillance.
The full whitepaper with manufacturer roadmap structures the key questions and translates regulatory complexity into concrete courses of action. The sections below give an overview of the core topics.
When is AI software a medical device?
Regulatory classification under the MDR and IVDR: the intended purpose as the decisive criterion and typical gray areas in practice.
High-risk categorization under the AI Act
Which AI systems are automatically classified as high-risk and why the MDR/IVDR classification is the decisive trigger.
Requirements for high-risk AI (Art. 8-15)
From risk management and data governance through transparency and human oversight to cybersecurity - what the AI Act concretely requires of manufacturers.
Manufacturer roadmap through 2028
Short-term measures by the end of 2026 and medium-term steps through 2028: portfolio analysis, QMS expansion and early involvement of notified bodies.
Recent deadline extensions in the AI Act
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the digital omnibus on AI, published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and in force since 27 July 2026) extended the application deadlines for high-risk AI systems. Under Art. 6(2) in conjunction with Annex III, the high-risk obligations apply to the use cases listed there from 2 December 2027; under Art. 6(1) in conjunction with Annex I, for AI embedded in products, from 2 August 2028. For medical technology, however, the later date does not apply across the board: it only covers AI systems that are themselves a medical device or in vitro diagnostic (or a safety component of one) and whose conformity assessment under the MDR or IVDR requires a notified body. Obligations already in force remain unaffected by the postponement: the AI literacy requirements under Art. 4 have applied since 2 February 2025, and the transparency obligations under Art. 50 have generally applied since 2 August 2026.
MDR Simplification Proposal and Digital Omnibus
How ongoing legislative initiatives continue to shape the regulatory landscape and why continuous monitoring remains indispensable.
Relevant for your project?
Similar questions in your current project?
In a first call we clarify what is specifically relevant for your situation, without obligation.
Request a call →Life Science Journal
Regulatory updates, straight to your inbox.
New requirements, authority decisions and practice notes. Once a month, unsubscribe any time.
Regulations & standards considered
- EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689)
- Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (digital omnibus / AI Act amendment)
- EU MDR (Regulation 2017/745)
- EU IVDR (Regulation 2017/746)
- MDCG 2019-11 Rev. 1 (Qualification and Classification of Software under MDR and IVDR)
- MDCG 2025-6 / AIB 2025-1 (FAQ on the Interplay between MDR, IVDR and the AI Act)
- EN ISO 14971
- IEC 62304
- ISO/IEC 42001
Related expertise
EU AI Act →
Regulatory classification and CE marking obligation
Regulatory Affairs →
Strategic support throughout the approval process
Software as a Medical Device →
Development under IEC 62304 as a shared lifecycle for software and AI components
MDR Conformity →
Conformity assessment under EU 2017/745, into which the AI Act evidence is embedded
DiGA Approval →
DiGA under section 139e SGB V, usually software under MDR Annex VIII Rule 11
Related projects
All case studies →Sources
- EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), adopted 13 March 2024
- EU MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745)
- EU IVDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/746)
- MDCG 2019-11 Rev. 1: Qualification and Classification of Software under MDR and IVDR
- MDCG 2025-6 / AIB 2025-1: FAQ on the Interplay between MDR, IVDR and the AI Act
- European Commission, AI Office - AI Act Implementation Timeline, 2024
- Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (digital omnibus on AI): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/oj/eng
Related insights
All insights →Your project
Have a concrete project?
Briefly outline your situation. We'll respond with an initial assessment, usually within one business day.
Prefer direct? +49 89 4161170-0
info@theentourage.de
- Reply usually within one working day
- 4 offices: DE · CH · IT · US
- 100% life sciences





