Pharma
- What applies
- Qualification and validation under EU GMP Annex 15; for sterile medicinal products Annex 1 applies in addition.
- Who audits
- The GMP inspection by the competent authority (§ 64 AMG).
We guide CAPEX projects for regulated production facilities, from needs assessment through User Requirement Specification and tendering to GMP-compliant commissioning. Locking down GMP requirements, URS and qualification plan before contract award avoids the renegotiations and requalifications that end up costing more.
Overview
Support from needs assessment to qualified commissioning · EU GMP Guide (Eudralex Volume 4), EU GMP Annex 15, EU GMP Annex 1
Last updated: September 18, 2026
Investments in regulated production facilities rarely fail because of the technology, but because of gaps between the investment decision, requirements definition and qualification.
Industries
Services
Structuring make-or-buy, capacity and site assessment into a robust business case. Deliverable: a decision document for management and investors with capital requirements, an options comparison and an assessment of regulatory consequences.
Preparation of complete User Requirement Specifications with GMP requirements integrated from the outset under the EU GMP Guide, for sterile processes under Annex 1 and for cleanroom classes under ISO 14644. Deliverable: a verifiable URS as the basis for tendering and qualification.
Development of technical tender documents (RFQ, RFP), technical evaluation of bids and support during contract award. Deliverable: a documented supplier comparison and a contractually fixed scope with clear GMP and validation responsibility.
Ongoing controlling of milestones, budget and scope with regular GMP compliance assessments during the construction phase. Deliverable: status reports and deviation tracking throughout the course of the project.
How we work together
In a CAPEX project for a regulated production facility, the most expensive commitments are made before the first machine is ordered. The User Requirement Specification comes first, because under EU-GMP Annex 15 it is the starting point of qualification: whatever is not stated there cannot be demonstrated later in DQ, IQ, OQ and PQ.
Only once the URS fully captures the GMP requirements from the EU GMP Guide (Eudralex Volume 4) and, for sterile processes, from Annex 1 does the tender provide a benchmark against which bids can be compared and suppliers contractually bound.
Reversing this sequence and awarding the contract first shifts the clarification into the construction phase, where every correction runs through change orders.
Things get critical a second time at the transition from the supplier to the company's own site. A Factory Acceptance Test verifies against the URS before the facility is delivered; the Site Acceptance Test and the subsequent qualification under Annex 15 turn this into the documented evidence for GMP-compliant commissioning.
Defects identified in the FAT are cheap to resolve at the supplier, the same defects at the final site delay commissioning.
Precisely for this reason the qualification plan belongs in the early planning and not at the end of the project, and precisely for this reason we review the regulatory consequences of a new facility or a new site already in the business case, before capital is committed.
Our approach
Step
Result
Needs Assessment & Business Case
Decision document with capital requirements, an options comparison and identified regulatory consequences.
URS & GMP Requirements
Complete, verifiable URS with integrated GMP requirements as the basis for tendering and qualification.
Tendering & Award
Documented supplier comparison and contractually fixed scope with clear GMP and validation responsibility.
Construction & Project Controlling
Tracked milestones, budget and scope with ongoing GMP compliance assessments.
FAT & SAT
Accepted acceptance test protocols against the URS, documented as a precursor to qualification.
Qualification & Commissioning
Facility qualified under Annex 15 and commissioned in a GMP-compliant manner.
Common pitfalls
The URS is written after contract award or remains incomplete.
Since the URS is the starting point of qualification under EU-GMP Annex 15, without it there is no benchmark for DQ, IQ, OQ and PQ. Defects only surface at acceptance and lead to renegotiations with the supplier.
GMP requirements are retrofitted only after the design is finalized.
Cleanability, material flow and prevention of cross-contamination under the EU GMP Guide, and for sterile processes under Annex 1, can only be corrected afterwards at considerable effort.
Responsibility for GMP compliance and validation is not governed in the supply contract.
If it remains open who delivers the qualification documentation and who is liable for GMP-compliant execution, gaps arise between the equipment supplier and the operator that become expensive over the course of the project.
Qualification and FAT are scheduled too late.
If the FAT at the supplier is skipped, defects only become visible at the final site, where rework delays commissioning instead of being resolved at the supplier before delivery.
Regulatory consequences of the investment are overlooked.
A new manufacturing site or a modified facility may require a variation to the marketing authorisation or an update of the technical documentation under MDR (EU) 2017/745 or IVDR (EU) 2017/746. If recognized late, this blocks market supply despite a completed facility.
Supply Chain & Technical Operations
In a first call we assess your situation and say what needs clarifying first in your case. Without obligation, reply usually within one working day.
FAQ
Image notice: The images on this page were generated using artificial intelligence. They do not depict real people, places, or events.
Life Science Journal
New requirements, authority decisions and practice notes. Once a month, unsubscribe any time.
Case Studies
Latest insights
All insights →GMP Consulting (Good Manufacturing Practice) →
GMP compliance for new facilities under the EU GMP Guide
Process Validation →
Qualification and validation of the facility under EU-GMP Annex 15
Computer System Validation (CSV) →
Validation of the facility's SCADA, PLC and control systems
Production Transfer & Scale-Up →
Technology transfer and scale-up after commissioning
Briefly outline your situation. We'll respond with an initial assessment, usually within one business day.
Prefer direct? +49 89 4161170-0
info@theentourage.de