Human monoclonal therapeutic antibodies based on plant systems for human use.

Is the next generation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies tobacco plant-derived?

Since almost 70 years biologicals and vaccines are produced in animal and human cell substrates, that actually started in 1954 where an experimental adenoviral vaccine was being developed in human tumour cells (Hela cells). At that time no full understanding regarding safety aspects of the various cell types used was available, which was subsequently developed over the next years differentiating “normal cells” from Primary Cell Cultures (PCC) and Human Diploid Cells (HDCL/ DCL), Continuous Cell Lines (CCL), and other “novel cell substrates”.1,2,3

The Poliomyelitis vaccine development requirements were available from 1965, after the formerly Papovavirus SV40 (Simian Virus 40) (now: Polyomavirus Macaca mulatta polyomavirus 1 4) was detected in virus harvests grown on monkey kidney tissues, especially from rhesus monkeys and steps were taken to eliminate this agent, both by recommendations that only monkeys known to be free from SV40 shall be used for production and by the introduction of tests for the presence of this virus (4) was detected in virus harvests grown on monkey kidney tissues, especially from rhesus monkeys and steps were taken to eliminate this agent, both by recommendations that only monkeys known to be free from SV40 shall be used for production and by the introduction of tests for the presence of this virus5,6.

WHO takes leading role in cell substrate safety.

Since then, we understand the issues of adventitious agents, that needs to be addressed and tested for of the cell substrate(s) used.

Starting 1986, the WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates took a leading role in addressing biosafety and safety risks of cell substrates in the use of developing biologicals, while in the years 2006 to 2010 knowledge-based US, FDA-, WHO- and EU-regulatory guidance/ legal requirements have “exploded” 7-19.

At the time, Hess et al. (2012) attempted to20, attempted to shed some light on the biosafety issues and regulatory requirements for the various animal, novel or human-derived cell substrates used in the manufacture of biological products that manufacturers face. They proposed - for the first time - a comprehensive, arbitrary classification for the estimated risk of cell substrates in the manufacture of human vaccines, taking into account cell origin, adventitious agents, endogenous viruses, cell karyotype, growth capacity, mechanism of transformation, tumourigenicity and oncogenicity.

This scientific review illustrates the various regulatory hurdles that need to be overcome in thoroughly assessing/testing/working through and overcoming the potential biosafety and security risks associated with the use of different cell substrates not only for vaccines but also for the production of mAbs ("monoclonal antibodies").

Live viral vaccines as the greatest safety risk.

Live attenuated viral vaccines undoubtedly pose the greatest biosafety challenges, as stringent downstream purification methods are not an option as they would compromise the integrity of the live viral vaccine21. In any case, the tumorigenic and also oncogenic potential that may be inherent in the different cell substrates used must be extensively tested for.

Today, it is mainly the most comprehensively characterised CHO cell substrates, Chinese Hamster Ovary cells, that are used for the development of biologics and the production of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for humans, while the "regulatory acceptance" of cell substrates other than CHO cells is crucial for the development of biologics and mAbs ("monoclonal antibodies")22.

Recalling the much-needed but (for good reason) almost never-ending FDA and WHO safety discussions on so-called "novel cell substrates" (e.g. PER-C6, a human embryonic retinal cell immortalised by transfection with adenovirus type 5 E1), the use of novel cell substrates, especially those previously unknown to regulators, raises red flags. WHO recently issued an initial DRAFT document to solicit comments and suggestions on the proposals contained therein, which will then be considered by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation (ECBS), as it has been requested to provide additional clarity and more detail on the specific guidance for mAbs produced from plant systems.23.

Molecular Plant Pharming.

MAbs may be produced in cultured mammalian cells, such as CHO, SP2/0 or NSO cells, human cell lines such as PER-C6 or HEK, as well as in bacterial cells, yeast, fungi, plants or cultured plant cells. The preparation may be generated from cells or plants producing only mAb fragments or genetically altered mAbs. Following purification, the mAbs or mAb fragments can be further modified to alter their pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic profiles. The microbiological risks of plant-derived substrates may be substantially different from those involved in animal-derived reagents and other hazards may arise – such as immunogenic, mitogenic and allergenic properties of the reagent and its components. Plant-derived material may, for instance, carry an increased risk of mycoplasma and mycobacteria contamination 24.

In recent years, progress has been made in using plants as an expression system to produce biologics and vaccines, including recombinant therapeutic proteins, which is referred to as Plant Molecular Farming (PMF). The recombinant proteins, including mAbs, can be produced in plants by stable expression, transient expression and transgenic plant cell expression in plant cells. Plants can make post-translational modifications similar to those of human and mammalian cells, but this results in a different glycosylation pattern than substrates from animal or human cells. However, the difference in glycosylation patterns of plant-derived proteins can be overcome by glycoengineering in plants to obtain humanised proteins25.

Development of plant cell substrate-based biologics hold promising potential.

In light of the current Coronavirus pandemic, developing plant-derived candidate vaccines and biologics against emerging coronavirus infections may provide a platform with a huge potential, which has been reviewed by Shanmugaraj et al., 202126 Though none of the SARS-CoV-2-related products/vaccines as reported have been authorized for market yet, and are currently either under research or in preclinical phases and/or phase I/II clinical trials. Meher Un Nessa et al., 202027 present a total of 53 research articles reporting the action of plant-produced monoclonal antibodies as immunotherapy for cancer, illustrating 200 phase 1, 110 phase 2 and 33 late stage clinical phase for antibody development. Numerous plant species which can proficiently engineered for mAb production include Nicotiana benthamiana, Nicotiana tabacum, Arabidopsis thaliana and others, while the highest biomass yield was found in tobacco species. Tobacco is a non-food, non-feed, and well-specified expression system, excluding human pathogen contamination, which can decrease biosafety concerns28.

The Coronavirus pandemic as well as increasing global vaccine demand are requiring high vaccine manufacturing capabilities. Better utilization of currently used cell substrates, but also the introduction of novel cell substrates may provide higher vaccine yields and thus may contribute to meeting production targets satisfying worldwide supply. Different vaccine types, most importantly live attenuated virus vaccines manufactured in cell substrates require highest cell substrate characterization with regards to identity, stability, purity, adventitious agents/viruses, tumorigenicity and oncogenicity.

There is still a lack of standardisation and harmonisation of the various guidance documents around the world, although the relevant guidance documents are constantly being revised to represent the latest and most modern technologies, which also reflect knowledge based on historical data. The lack of harmonisation is a challenge for biologics and mAbs, but also for vaccine manufacturers who want to deliver globally in order to obtain regulatory approval for these cell-based vaccines.

The question is: Would plant-derived biologics/vaccines and/or monoclonal antibody production facilitate or reduce the effort of thorough characterisation of cell substrates and accelerate the knowledge base, leading to faster regulatory acceptance of these plant-derived biologics - OR - are we "opening a can of worms" (microbiological, random pathogens, immunogenic, tumorigenic, oncogenic, mitogenic, allergenic properties)? We will see!

At any rate, the WHO, the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) has started to provide guidance on mAbs manufactured from genetically engineered transgenic plant-based systems and is seeking public consultation and input for their guidance.

I think, this is a good first step into the right direction.

Literature.

  1. WHO Technical Report Series No. 978, 2013: Annex 3, Recommendations for the evaluation of animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological medicinal products and for the characterization of cell banks. Replacement of Annex 1 of WHO Technical Report Series, No. 878, 22 May 2013.
  2. WHO Technical Report Series 878, WHO expert committee on biological standardization, Forty-seventh report, 1998, WHO_TRS_878.pdf, accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  3. Hess RD, Weber F, Watson K, Schmitt S, 2012: Regulatory, biosafety and safety challenges for novel cells as substrates for human vaccines. Vaccine 30 (2012) 2715- 2727 (a)
  4. Polyomavirus Macaca mulatta polyomavirus 1 ( Taxonomy browser (Macaca mulatta polyomavirus 1) (nih.gov), accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  5. Requirements for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated). In: Requirements for biological substances: 1. general requirements for manufacturing establishments and control laboratories; 2. Requirements for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated). Report of a Study Group. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1959 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 178).
  6. Requirements for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated). In: Requirements for biological substances. Report of a WHO Expert Group. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1966 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 323).
  7. Recommendations for the evaluation of animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological medicinal products and for the characterization of cell banks. Proposed replacement of TRS 878, Annex I. http://www.who.int/biologicals/Cell Substrates clean version 18 April.pdf
  8. Evaluation of cell substrates for the production of biologics. Revision of WHO recommendations. Report of the WHO Study Group on cell substrates for the production of biologicals. Bethesda, USA: WHO; 22-23 April 2009.
  9. Recommendations for the evaluation of animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological medicinal products and for the characterization of cell banks. WHO, Draft; 8 July 2009.
  10. Knezevic I, G Stacey G, Petricciani J, Sheets R, WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates. Evaluation of cell substrates for the production of biologicals: Revision of WHO recommendations. Report of the WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates for the Production of Biologicals, 22-23 April 2009, Bethesda, USA. Biologicals. 2010 Jan;38(1):162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.08.019, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19818645/, accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  11. Guidance for industry: characterization and qualification of cell substrates and other biological starting materials used in the production of viral vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. Draft Guidance US CBER; September 2006.
  12. Guidance for industry: characterization and qualification of cell substrates and other biological materials used in the production of viral vaccines for infectious disease indications.
  13. February 2010. Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications, FDA, accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  14. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 01/2008:2031 Monoclonal Antibodies For Human Use.
  15. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 01/2008:0784 Recombinant DNA technology, products of
  16. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 5.1.7. Viral safety.
  17. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 5.2.2 Chicken flocks free from specific pathogens for the production and quality control of vaccines.
  18. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 5.2.3 Cell substrate for the production of vaccines
    for human use.
  19. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) 2.6.16. Tests for extraneous agents in viral vaccines for human use.
  20. Op cit. 3.
  21. Ibid
  22. Hess RD 2012: Regulatory, biosafety and safety challenges for novel cells as substrates for human vaccines. 6th Vaccine & ISV Congress Shanghai, China, 15, Oct 2012. (b)
  23. WHO/MAB/DRAFT/12 October 2021. WHO Guideline for the safe production and quality control of monoclonal antibodies for use in humans. mabs-manufacture-guideline-draft-for-1st-public-comment.pdf (who.int) , accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  24. Shanmugaraj B, Siriwattananon K, Malla, A, Phoolcharoen W, 2021. Potential for Developing Plant-Derived Candidate Vaccines and Biologics against Emerging Coronavirus Infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10081051, accessed 3 JAN 2022.
  25. Op cit. 24.
  26. Ibid
  27. Meher Un Nessa, Md Atiar Rahman, Yearul Kabir, 2021. Plant-Produced Monoclonal Antibody as Immunotherapy for Cancer. Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2020, Article ID 3038564, 10 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3038564, accessed 3 JAN 2022.

Share Article.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
XING
WhatsApp
Email

Persons to the article.

Dr Ralf Hess

Principal Consultant IVD

Dr. Ralf Hess studied biology at the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, where he also completed his doctorate at the Institute of Virology. Dr. Hess has many years of experience in the development of medical devices and medicinal products and their combination, in laboratory analysis and quality assurance. The quality expert has set up, implemented and maintained QM systems in accordance with ISO and GxP for various areas of application. The customer service portfolio ranges from manufacturers of classical and biological drugs, medical device companies and vaccine manufacturers to immunohistochemical, immunological, molecular biological and serological diagnostic laboratories. Dr. Hess works worldwide as an auditor in the GxP/ISO area and has many years of experience in FDA remediation projects and the regulatory development of combination products (drug device products).
Dr. Ralf Hess supports Entourage as Principal Consultant IVD.

Newsletter.

Read more.

Clinical evidence for IVD. Why you should use CLSI.
Discover the gold standard for in-vitro diagnostics: How CLSI assessment protocols are ...
The development of value-based and strategic partnerships.
How CDMOs are building value-based and strategic partnerships in the post-pandemic ...
News on the harmonized standard ISO 15223.
News on the harmonized standard ISO 15223.
Progressive roll-out of the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation for "legacy" IVDD-CE-marked devices.
An extension of the transitional periods should increase the pressure on IVD manufacturers ...
The future of the pharmaceutical industry is data-driven operations.
Data-driven surgery is the trend of the future in ...